Conan O’Brien walked onto the stage at the Dolby Theatre on March 15 to lead the 98th Oscars, a role that remains the most scrutinized assignment in Hollywood. Producers chose the veteran late-night personality to bring a sense of stability back to a broadcast that has frequently experimented with host-less formats and multiple-emcee ensembles. Critics immediately began dissecting his opening monologue, which relied heavily on his signature self-deprecation and observations regarding the length of the nominated films. One specific joke aimed at the runtime of the year’s lead Best Picture contender drew a mixture of laughter and audible groans from the front rows. The comedian ended his monologue with a jab at his own lack of a current talk show.
Entertainment journalists and industry analysts were quick to note that the evening felt like a return to traditional award show values. O’Brien handled the first hour with a brisk pace, avoiding the long-form sketches that have bogged down previous ceremonies. But his reliance on older comedic tropes led some viewers on social media to describe the performance as out of step with a younger, digital-first audience. Industry insiders had hoped his presence would boost domestic television ratings, which have struggled to return to pre-pandemic peaks. Preliminary data from the Nielsen company suggested that while the initial audience was large, retention during the second hour showed a slight decline.
Conan O’Brien and the History of Hosting Struggles
Hosting the Academy Awards is a task widely considered to be a losing proposition for even the most seasoned performers. Newsweek reported that social media users were deeply divided over O’Brien’s effectiveness, with some calling for a permanent retirement of the solo host format. Veteran comics often describe the gig as a high-risk venture with very little professional upside. The expectations are paradoxically high and low.
Audiences want a smooth, funny show, but they also expect the host to be the first casualty of a long night.
"The most thankless job as a comic is hosting an awards show," commented one social-media user on Conan O'Brien.
Academy officials reportedly spent $100 million on the overall production of the telecast, emphasizing high-tech stage designs and live musical performances. O’Brien had to compete with these spectacle-heavy elements while keeping the focus on the nominees. At one point, a technical glitch during the presentation of the Best Sound category forced the host to improvise for nearly two minutes.
He filled the time with a story about his early days in television writing, a move that some praised for its professionalism while others found it distracting. His ability to handle the unexpected became a central point of the post-show debate.
Previous hosts like Jimmy Kimmel and Chris Rock faced similar bifurcated reviews during their respective tenures. Critics often argue that the format itself is the problem rather than the individual standing at the microphone. Still, the Academy continues to search for a personality who can bridge the gap between old-school Hollywood and the fragmented streaming era. O’Brien was seen as a safe choice, a professional who could be trusted not to cause a scandal. He stayed largely within the lanes of safe, observational humor throughout the four-hour broadcast.
Political Tensions During the 98th Oscars Broadcast
National politics loomed over the festivities in Los Angeles despite the heavy focus on cinematic achievement. NPR reported that while the stars were gathering at the Dolby Theatre, the Senate was preparing for a vote on the SAVE America Act. This voting overhaul has polarized Washington, and the tension was palpable in the pre-show interviews on the red carpet. Several actors and directors used their time at the microphone to make pointed references to the legislative battle. These moments of advocacy often clashed with the escapist tone O’Brien attempted to maintain during his segments. He refrained from making any direct mentions of the SAVE Act in his prepared material.
Discussions in the green room often drifted toward the political climate rather than the category results. Actors expressed concern about how the proposed voting changes might impact the upcoming election cycle. In turn, several conservative commentators criticized the ceremony for being a platform for elite political posturing. The contrast between the glamorous setting and the grim legislative debates in the capital highlighted a persistent divide in American public life. O’Brien managed to keep the transitions between awards smooth, but he could not entirely insulate the room from the outside world. Producers had reportedly asked presenters to keep their speeches brief to avoid overrunning the allotted time.
Digital Audience Backlash to Conan O’Brien Monologue
Viewers on digital platforms were particularly vocal about the perceived quality of the jokes. For one, many felt that the humor did not translate well to a clip-based social media environment. Short snippets of the monologue failed to gain the viral traction that producers usually rely on for post-show engagement. Instead, the most shared moments of the night were the unscripted interactions between the winners and their peers. One single-sentence observation from a prominent film critic on Platform X summarized the sentiment: the host was a professional in a room that wanted a provocateur. This disconnect fueled hours of debate across various online forums and entertainment blogs.
But some industry veterans defended the performance as a necessary course correction. They argued that the ceremony needed a host who understood the mechanics of a live broadcast without trying to become the main event. O’Brien avoided the self-indulgent musical numbers that have characterized past hosting turns. He focused on moving the show forward and ensuring that the winners had their moment. Even so, the lack of a standout, viral moment left many wondering if the solo host format has finally run its course. The debate over his performance is likely to influence the Academy’s search for next year’s emcee.
Academy Strategy and Future Hosting Prospects
Academy leaders must now evaluate whether the 2026 broadcast achieved its goals of audience growth and brand stability. Internal reports suggest that the organization is satisfied with the lack of controversy, which had plagued several recent ceremonies. Yet the tepid response to the traditional hosting style suggests that a more radical change may be necessary for the 99th edition. Some producers are advocating for a rotation of different hosts for each hour of the show to maintain energy and appeal to different demographics. This approach would be a significant departure from the singular focus provided by O’Brien. The 98th Oscars will likely be remembered as the final attempt to reclaim a bygone era of television.
Speculation has already begun regarding who might take the stage for the centennial celebration in two years. Names like John Mulaney and Quinta Brunson have been floated as potential candidates who could offer a more contemporary energy. To that end, the Academy is conducting extensive audience research to determine what modern viewers actually want from an awards broadcast. The findings will dictate whether they double down on the veteran late-night model or pivot toward something entirely different. O’Brien’s performance is a data point for this ongoing strategic shift. He proved that a professional can still run a clean show, even if the magic is harder to find.
The Elite Tribune Perspective
Stop looking for a savior in a tuxedo. The obsession with finding the perfect host for the Oscars is a symptom of a larger delusion within the film industry. Hollywood continues to believe that if it just finds the right comedian to make jokes about Ozempic and three-hour runtimes, the American public will suddenly care about art films they haven't seen. Conan O’Brien did exactly what he was hired to do: he provided a professional veneer for a bloated, self-congratulatory industry that is terrified of its own irrelevance. He was a human shield against the boredom of a four-hour telecast.
To blame the host for a lack of excitement is to blame the waiter for a tasteless meal. The problem isn't the delivery; it is the product. Until the Academy realizes that a telecast celebrating movies must actually feel like a movie, exciting, paced, and visually arresting, it will continue to fail. No amount of late-night polish can fix a ceremony that has become a chore for the audience and a risk for the performer. The 98th Oscars proved that even the best hosts are just rearranging deck chairs on a sinking ship of traditional media.
If the Academy wants to survive until its 100th anniversary, it needs to stop hiring hosts and start rethinking why it still broadcasts this ritual in the first place.